Raymond Joao, Esq.
NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT COURT ORDER FOR INVESTIGATION OF JOAO
REBUTTAL TO RAYMOND JOAO BAR COMPLAINT RESPONSE
REPRESENTED WITH PROSKAUER BUT ALSO WITH MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN WOLFE AND SCHLISSEL
(and again I use Esq. improperly whereas it should be Esqueer)
Raymond Anthony Joao, the Patent Attorney with 90 patents in his name, all to do with the Iviewit inventions, what more can be said, asssshole. Most famous patent with Rubenstein as co-inventor "System & Method for Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office." (footnote to that link, this was done in the very beginning of piecing together the evidence trail when very little was known, maybe). Imagine that, we formed our initial complaint against the attorneys involved, to the patent office, in the form of a patent filing for how to commit fraud on the patent office, pretty funny and it illustrates my dark side. Ray once told me that he had dreams of his father after his death that haunted him, may I replace his father for his crimes against the children. His bar complaint rebuttal was handled by Steven C. Krane, former President of the New York State Bar Association, senior member of the New York bar disciplinary departments, Proskauer partner, Iviewit shareholder and fat unethical bastard, who acted in conflict, violating public office, a public office of ethics no less, to represent Proskauer partners and himself in the complaints filed in New York against them, with no disclosure of his conflicts or that he had roles at the Supreme Court First Department or that his tenure as bar President at the time precluded him from representing any bar complaints and oh what a can of worms is unfolding from his getting caught and his crimes to dodge investigation.
Joao's response to the evidence against him was to have Krane, the most influential member of the disciplinary departments in New York and Proskauer partner, handle his complaint in conflict and violation of his public offices. The conflict and violation of public office was the only way to get out of this for Joao. Now that the conflict was discovered and Krane, Joao and Rubenstein were ordered by five Justices unanimously for investigation, we shall see how long they breathe free air. Tick Tock.
REBUTTAL TO RAYMOND JOAO BAR COMPLAINT RESPONSE
REPRESENTED WITH PROSKAUER BUT ALSO WITH MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN WOLFE AND SCHLISSEL
(and again I use Esq. improperly whereas it should be Esqueer)
Raymond Anthony Joao, the Patent Attorney with 90 patents in his name, all to do with the Iviewit inventions, what more can be said, asssshole. Most famous patent with Rubenstein as co-inventor "System & Method for Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office." (footnote to that link, this was done in the very beginning of piecing together the evidence trail when very little was known, maybe). Imagine that, we formed our initial complaint against the attorneys involved, to the patent office, in the form of a patent filing for how to commit fraud on the patent office, pretty funny and it illustrates my dark side. Ray once told me that he had dreams of his father after his death that haunted him, may I replace his father for his crimes against the children. His bar complaint rebuttal was handled by Steven C. Krane, former President of the New York State Bar Association, senior member of the New York bar disciplinary departments, Proskauer partner, Iviewit shareholder and fat unethical bastard, who acted in conflict, violating public office, a public office of ethics no less, to represent Proskauer partners and himself in the complaints filed in New York against them, with no disclosure of his conflicts or that he had roles at the Supreme Court First Department or that his tenure as bar President at the time precluded him from representing any bar complaints and oh what a can of worms is unfolding from his getting caught and his crimes to dodge investigation.
Joao's response to the evidence against him was to have Krane, the most influential member of the disciplinary departments in New York and Proskauer partner, handle his complaint in conflict and violation of his public offices. The conflict and violation of public office was the only way to get out of this for Joao. Now that the conflict was discovered and Krane, Joao and Rubenstein were ordered by five Justices unanimously for investigation, we shall see how long they breathe free air. Tick Tock.
0 comments:
Post a Comment