The Damning Whistleblower Case of Christine C. Anderson
"The Damning Whistleblower Case of Christine C. Anderson –
Allegations of Coercion, Assault, Title 18 and State Obstruction of Justice via Official Supreme Court Document Destruction Inside the First Department by Public Officials, for “Favored Law Firms”
Christine Anderson provides a pivotal link in her heroic Whistleblowing revelations that shed insight into the criminal behavior running rampant at the highest levels of the First Department, including Coercion, Obstruction, Tampering with Official Investigatory Files, Threatening Federal Witnesses, Document Destruction and Physical Assaults on a Whistleblower tying Iviewit to her own complaint. Anderson’s original lawsuit filing discussed the impact of Iviewit on her situation relating to a Complaint filed against Cahill and others13, as part of her allegations.
Anderson’s Original Complaint can be found at Iviewit Homepage, Evidence Link or @ http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/anderson/20071028%20Anderson%20Original%20Filing.pdf
Pages 24-25 contain references to the Iviewit Cahill, Krane et al. complaints.
Christine C. Anderson a former Staff Attorney at the First Dept filed WHISTLEBLOWER allegations in a Fed Whistleblower suit slated for trial Oct 13 in US District Court Southern District NY (USDC), Anderson v State of NY, 07cv09599.
Pages 24-25 contain references to the Iviewit Cahill, Krane et al. complaints.
Christine C. Anderson a former Staff Attorney at the First Dept filed WHISTLEBLOWER allegations in a Fed Whistleblower suit slated for trial Oct 13 in US District Court Southern District NY (USDC), Anderson v State of NY, 07cv09599.
http://iviewit.tv/press/press1.pdf
Anderson’s suit adjudicated by Judge Shira Scheindlin contains allegations of retaliation against Anderson for termination from her job of 6 years, after Anderson exposed systemic Whitewashing & Obstruction inside the First Dept, claiming favoritism by the First Dept for favored law firms & attorneys. I have attached in my Prepared Statement links to several news articles relating to Anderson. http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html & http://iviewit.tv/press/press2.pdf
Anderson’s suit set to bring volcanic like testimony involving Public Office corruption & testimony by officials of the NY State Unified Court system, including Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, Presiding Judge at the First Dept during the firing of Anderson. Along with Lippman will be Defendants in Anderson, First Dept Supervisor Sherry Cohen, Former Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill, Hon John Buckley, David Spokony & Catherine O’Hagen Wolfe, Clerk @ US Second Circuit Court of Appeals (USCA), an initial Anderson defendant in her former job as Clerk for the First Dept, now witness in Anderson. Anderson claims Physical Assault & Harassment by Cohen for her heroic WHISTLEBLOWING efforts, Anderson gave riveting testimony at the first of these hearings by the NY Senate Judiciary Committee headed by Hon. Senator John L. Sampson. Anderson’s testimony found online and links again are provided in the written statement. Anderson’s testimony comes at 30min into the video found online at the NY State Senate Website or @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit%2Etv%2F&feature=player_embedded
Prior to permitting Anderson to trial, Scheindlin marked 7 suits, including Iviewit’s Multi-Count Multi-Trillion Dollar suit http://iviewit.tv/press/press3.pdf legally “related” to Anderson.
Proskauer’s Control of The Courts and First Department or How a Criminal Enterprise Cloaked as a Law Firm Controls the NY Courts and Disciplinary
Much of this control at the First Department stems from Proskauer’s influence over the First Department, which has tentacles extending back to Joseph Proskauer in 1923. For those of you, except Senator Sampson who is a former member of Proskauer, who may not know the history of Proskauer, allow me briefly to fill in some NY history:
A Bit of NY History Regarding Proskauer
But as LaRouche points out, such efforts were not restricted to Germany. Simultaneous with the Hitler coup in Germany, London-directed Morgan and Mellon interests were involved in organizing an attempted fascist coup in the United States against President Franklin Roosevelt. The coup plot, slated for full activation by no later than 1935, was exposed in Congressional testimony in November-December 1934 by Marine hero, Major General Smedley Darlington Butler (1881-1940). Earlier, in February 1933, these same networks attempted the assassination of FDR, the failure of which led to the ``blown'' coup plot option.
While at least the rudimentary facts and dates of the Hitler coup are known, the bankers' fascist plot against FDR has been, to this day, blacked out of the history books. To the extent that it is discussed at all, it has been ridiculed as the delusions of Maj. Gen. Butler, whom the coup plotters proposed for their ``man on the white horse.'' But, as we shall show, it was not only very real, but, if not for the intervention of the hero, Maj. Gen. Butler, it had a chance to succeed in creating the pretext for a fascist police state in this country... The League's [ League of Treason ] initiating executive committee were Morgan-allied stooges… On its Executive Committee was Morgan stooge and former New York Supreme Court Justice Joseph M. Proskauer, the general counsel to the Consolidated Gas Company.” http://american_almanac.tripod.com/smedley.htm The Morgan-British Fascist Coup Against FDR by Lonnie Wolfe Printed in the American Almanac, February, 1999.
From Proskauer’s website I quote,
Governor Smith appointed Joseph Proskauer to fill an unexpired term on the New York State Supreme Court in June 1923. That November, he was elected to a full term, and, in 1927, was appointed an associate justice of the Appellate Division, First Department…Judge Proskauer decided to resign from the bench to return to private practice.
Article @ http://american_almanac.tripod.com/smedley.htm
Proskauer’s site fails to explain the cause of Joseph Proskauer’s resignation from the Appellate Division, First Department, I will leave this history lesson for another day.
At the same time the Patentgate probes were being secreted by state officials in New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent bar and the United States Patent Office suspended the Intellectual Property beginning formal investigations. Investigations by Federal Attorney Patent Bar agents into the same matters implicating the same attorneys that the NY Disciplinary Committees had dismissed on review with no investigations, despite a Court Ordered Investigation, ordered by the FIRST DEPARTMENT itself, despite knowledge of the Federal Investigations, again, without the Conflicts at the top of the disciplinary known this would seem impossible.
The Motion filed by Iviewit mentioned in Anderson’s Original Complaint was filed upon the bequest of Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of the First Department court. Wolfe exposed the Cahill and Krane Conflicts and Violations of Public Offices that led to the Court Ordered Investigations by the First Department involving Thomas Cahill, Proskauer, Rubenstein, Krane, Meltzer, Joao and others which has been "pending" since February of 2003. Wolfe had stated that despite Cahill’s denial that Krane did not have Multiple Official Conflicting Public Office Positions, including those with the First Department that the three of them were having an Official First Department meeting with Krane in Official Capacity and that Cahill was fully aware of Krane’s conflicts. Wolfe then directed me to file the Motion with the First Department that led to a unanimous Order for Investigation by five Justices, for Conflicts of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety. To hold this landslide off would require top down control of the courts and the disciplinary.
How To Block Court Ordered Investigations – Corruption Top Down
Conflicts discovered at the top of the courts and disciplinary departments, all radiating from Proskauer and Foley, showed how the criminal enterprise cloaked as law firms then networked to block due process, intertwining themselves through the various courts, law enforcement agencies and disciplinary committees to interfere in conflict wherever Iviewit filed complaints. First, in order to understand the hierarchy one must know that Krane formerly clerked for former Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye and I will take a moment to read into the record Krane’s roles in the courts and disciplinary bodies,
Then, Judge Kaye was married at the time of the Iviewit matters to a Proskauer Partner the recently deceased Stephen Kaye. Judge Judith Kaye was the highest ranking Public Official in the state of New York’s courts and disciplinary departments, no more is needed to be said then Kaye had absolute control over the courts and disciplinary committees.
From Kaye’s husband we find further tentacles at the top and from Stephen Kaye’s Biography I recite his influence at the First Department,
Steve's experience and expertise in the field of professional responsibility spans 35 years. This has included past membership in the Policy Committee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee and past Hearing Panel Chair for that Committee; past membership in the New York State Judicial Institute on Professionalism in the Law; past Chair of the Committee on Professional Discipline and past Chair of the Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. He also has served the legal community in leadership and membership capacities on a number of other committees of the City Bar Association, the New York County Lawyers Association and the New York State Bar Association.
Further, Stephen Kaye, late in life made partner of the newly formed Proskauer Intellectual Property Department, formed instantly after learning of the Iviewit inventions and after acquisition of Rubenstein and control over the MPEGLA patent pools was obtained. Then MPEGLA became one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies certainly doing well for the Proskauer Intellectual Property partners and not for their client at all.
Proskauer behind all of the Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public Offices found in the New York Courts, Judith Kaye, Stephen Kaye and Steven Krane are several of only a handful of people who could have masterminded and perpetrated the scheme to indefinitely delay and dismiss without investigation complaints against her husband’s firm Proskauer and her former law clerk Krane. Kaye having a vested interest in the outcome of the matters was notified and aware of the Iviewit complaints and orders for investigations and did nothing to intercede on Iviewit’s behalf, yet at that time Iviewit had no idea of the web of conflicts of interests precluding her from “taking the bull by the horn” in her courts and why she was avoiding the unfolding scandal, as no one knew of her undisclosed conflicts in the matters. Her interests also include the fact that if they were unsuccessful at blocking the complaints, Kaye and her husband would personally suffer loss of her husbands entire net worth, the firm Proskauer would be sunk, her husband and partners at Proskauer could be facing life + prison sentences for their crimes and this provides the motive for the Cover-Up and to continue to enjoy the stolen royalties of course. Shortly after directing me to file the Motion that led to the Orders, Wolfe transferred jobs mysteriously from the State Court to the Federal US Second Circuit where my lawsuit is now pending.
With that history of Proskauer’s control of the First Department and courts, from Judith Kaye’s influence down through the highest public offices in New York, all those involved are now named Defendants in my Federal Lawsuit with complaints against them in a host of law enforcement and disciplinary complaints. From an article from Expose Corrupt Courts directly relating to the Patentgate matters and linking Anderson with Iviewit and calling it Tammany Hall II, I quote,
The various Cahill Proskauer issues bounced around under the public radar screen at the Court of Appeals in Albany and were ultimately transferred from the 1st Department to the 2nd Department in Brooklyn. This was done after 5 justices of the 1st Dept ruled unanimously to investigate Krane, Rubenstein and Joao for conflict of interest and the appearance of impropriety after their review of the 1st Department complaint.
The Cahill inquiry is apparently "still pending" under attorney Martin R. Gold who, insiders say, was directed to "sit on it…forever."
Earlier this year, FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. assigned additional agents to the Public Integrity Corruption squad at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, and where agents have been actively conducting interviews.
Despite the Unanimous 5-0 Decision by the First Dept ordering Investigation of the Complaints then transferred to the Second Dept for investigation, the Second Dept DISMISSED the Complaints Summarily without Explanation or Investigation, failing to follow the Court Order thereby continuing to permit conflicts and misconduct and blocking due process once again. In fact, the Second Dept Chief Counsel, Kearse, admitted to direct conflicts with Krane of Proskauer and then acted on the matters failing to address the conflicts she had admitted too.
A few crime charts here will help show the connections to Proskauer in the Cover-Up crimes in both New York and Florida. New connections between the Virginia Commonwealth, the Virginia AG and Foley have recently been unearthed and have been reported to the USDC and USCA in my Lawsuit and new disciplinary complaints are being formulated for filing shortly.
Source and Full Article
Anderson’s suit adjudicated by Judge Shira Scheindlin contains allegations of retaliation against Anderson for termination from her job of 6 years, after Anderson exposed systemic Whitewashing & Obstruction inside the First Dept, claiming favoritism by the First Dept for favored law firms & attorneys. I have attached in my Prepared Statement links to several news articles relating to Anderson. http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2009/04/andersons-10-million-lawsuit-proceeds.html & http://iviewit.tv/press/press2.pdf
Anderson’s suit set to bring volcanic like testimony involving Public Office corruption & testimony by officials of the NY State Unified Court system, including Court of Appeals Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, Presiding Judge at the First Dept during the firing of Anderson. Along with Lippman will be Defendants in Anderson, First Dept Supervisor Sherry Cohen, Former Chief Counsel Thomas J. Cahill, Hon John Buckley, David Spokony & Catherine O’Hagen Wolfe, Clerk @ US Second Circuit Court of Appeals (USCA), an initial Anderson defendant in her former job as Clerk for the First Dept, now witness in Anderson. Anderson claims Physical Assault & Harassment by Cohen for her heroic WHISTLEBLOWING efforts, Anderson gave riveting testimony at the first of these hearings by the NY Senate Judiciary Committee headed by Hon. Senator John L. Sampson. Anderson’s testimony found online and links again are provided in the written statement. Anderson’s testimony comes at 30min into the video found online at the NY State Senate Website or @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fiviewit%2Etv%2F&feature=player_embedded
Prior to permitting Anderson to trial, Scheindlin marked 7 suits, including Iviewit’s Multi-Count Multi-Trillion Dollar suit http://iviewit.tv/press/press3.pdf legally “related” to Anderson.
Proskauer’s Control of The Courts and First Department or How a Criminal Enterprise Cloaked as a Law Firm Controls the NY Courts and Disciplinary
Much of this control at the First Department stems from Proskauer’s influence over the First Department, which has tentacles extending back to Joseph Proskauer in 1923. For those of you, except Senator Sampson who is a former member of Proskauer, who may not know the history of Proskauer, allow me briefly to fill in some NY history:
A Bit of NY History Regarding Proskauer
But as LaRouche points out, such efforts were not restricted to Germany. Simultaneous with the Hitler coup in Germany, London-directed Morgan and Mellon interests were involved in organizing an attempted fascist coup in the United States against President Franklin Roosevelt. The coup plot, slated for full activation by no later than 1935, was exposed in Congressional testimony in November-December 1934 by Marine hero, Major General Smedley Darlington Butler (1881-1940). Earlier, in February 1933, these same networks attempted the assassination of FDR, the failure of which led to the ``blown'' coup plot option.
While at least the rudimentary facts and dates of the Hitler coup are known, the bankers' fascist plot against FDR has been, to this day, blacked out of the history books. To the extent that it is discussed at all, it has been ridiculed as the delusions of Maj. Gen. Butler, whom the coup plotters proposed for their ``man on the white horse.'' But, as we shall show, it was not only very real, but, if not for the intervention of the hero, Maj. Gen. Butler, it had a chance to succeed in creating the pretext for a fascist police state in this country... The League's [ League of Treason ] initiating executive committee were Morgan-allied stooges… On its Executive Committee was Morgan stooge and former New York Supreme Court Justice Joseph M. Proskauer, the general counsel to the Consolidated Gas Company.” http://american_almanac.tripod.com/smedley.htm The Morgan-British Fascist Coup Against FDR by Lonnie Wolfe Printed in the American Almanac, February, 1999.
From Proskauer’s website I quote,
Governor Smith appointed Joseph Proskauer to fill an unexpired term on the New York State Supreme Court in June 1923. That November, he was elected to a full term, and, in 1927, was appointed an associate justice of the Appellate Division, First Department…Judge Proskauer decided to resign from the bench to return to private practice.
Article @ http://american_almanac.tripod.com/smedley.htm
Proskauer’s site fails to explain the cause of Joseph Proskauer’s resignation from the Appellate Division, First Department, I will leave this history lesson for another day.
At the same time the Patentgate probes were being secreted by state officials in New York, the United States Patent and Trademark Office Patent bar and the United States Patent Office suspended the Intellectual Property beginning formal investigations. Investigations by Federal Attorney Patent Bar agents into the same matters implicating the same attorneys that the NY Disciplinary Committees had dismissed on review with no investigations, despite a Court Ordered Investigation, ordered by the FIRST DEPARTMENT itself, despite knowledge of the Federal Investigations, again, without the Conflicts at the top of the disciplinary known this would seem impossible.
The Motion filed by Iviewit mentioned in Anderson’s Original Complaint was filed upon the bequest of Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of the First Department court. Wolfe exposed the Cahill and Krane Conflicts and Violations of Public Offices that led to the Court Ordered Investigations by the First Department involving Thomas Cahill, Proskauer, Rubenstein, Krane, Meltzer, Joao and others which has been "pending" since February of 2003. Wolfe had stated that despite Cahill’s denial that Krane did not have Multiple Official Conflicting Public Office Positions, including those with the First Department that the three of them were having an Official First Department meeting with Krane in Official Capacity and that Cahill was fully aware of Krane’s conflicts. Wolfe then directed me to file the Motion with the First Department that led to a unanimous Order for Investigation by five Justices, for Conflicts of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety. To hold this landslide off would require top down control of the courts and the disciplinary.
How To Block Court Ordered Investigations – Corruption Top Down
Conflicts discovered at the top of the courts and disciplinary departments, all radiating from Proskauer and Foley, showed how the criminal enterprise cloaked as law firms then networked to block due process, intertwining themselves through the various courts, law enforcement agencies and disciplinary committees to interfere in conflict wherever Iviewit filed complaints. First, in order to understand the hierarchy one must know that Krane formerly clerked for former Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye and I will take a moment to read into the record Krane’s roles in the courts and disciplinary bodies,
Then, Judge Kaye was married at the time of the Iviewit matters to a Proskauer Partner the recently deceased Stephen Kaye. Judge Judith Kaye was the highest ranking Public Official in the state of New York’s courts and disciplinary departments, no more is needed to be said then Kaye had absolute control over the courts and disciplinary committees.
From Kaye’s husband we find further tentacles at the top and from Stephen Kaye’s Biography I recite his influence at the First Department,
Steve's experience and expertise in the field of professional responsibility spans 35 years. This has included past membership in the Policy Committee of the First Department Disciplinary Committee and past Hearing Panel Chair for that Committee; past membership in the New York State Judicial Institute on Professionalism in the Law; past Chair of the Committee on Professional Discipline and past Chair of the Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics of the Association of the Bar of the City of New York. He also has served the legal community in leadership and membership capacities on a number of other committees of the City Bar Association, the New York County Lawyers Association and the New York State Bar Association.
Further, Stephen Kaye, late in life made partner of the newly formed Proskauer Intellectual Property Department, formed instantly after learning of the Iviewit inventions and after acquisition of Rubenstein and control over the MPEGLA patent pools was obtained. Then MPEGLA became one of the largest infringers of the Iviewit technologies certainly doing well for the Proskauer Intellectual Property partners and not for their client at all.
Proskauer behind all of the Conflicts of Interest and Violations of Public Offices found in the New York Courts, Judith Kaye, Stephen Kaye and Steven Krane are several of only a handful of people who could have masterminded and perpetrated the scheme to indefinitely delay and dismiss without investigation complaints against her husband’s firm Proskauer and her former law clerk Krane. Kaye having a vested interest in the outcome of the matters was notified and aware of the Iviewit complaints and orders for investigations and did nothing to intercede on Iviewit’s behalf, yet at that time Iviewit had no idea of the web of conflicts of interests precluding her from “taking the bull by the horn” in her courts and why she was avoiding the unfolding scandal, as no one knew of her undisclosed conflicts in the matters. Her interests also include the fact that if they were unsuccessful at blocking the complaints, Kaye and her husband would personally suffer loss of her husbands entire net worth, the firm Proskauer would be sunk, her husband and partners at Proskauer could be facing life + prison sentences for their crimes and this provides the motive for the Cover-Up and to continue to enjoy the stolen royalties of course. Shortly after directing me to file the Motion that led to the Orders, Wolfe transferred jobs mysteriously from the State Court to the Federal US Second Circuit where my lawsuit is now pending.
With that history of Proskauer’s control of the First Department and courts, from Judith Kaye’s influence down through the highest public offices in New York, all those involved are now named Defendants in my Federal Lawsuit with complaints against them in a host of law enforcement and disciplinary complaints. From an article from Expose Corrupt Courts directly relating to the Patentgate matters and linking Anderson with Iviewit and calling it Tammany Hall II, I quote,
The various Cahill Proskauer issues bounced around under the public radar screen at the Court of Appeals in Albany and were ultimately transferred from the 1st Department to the 2nd Department in Brooklyn. This was done after 5 justices of the 1st Dept ruled unanimously to investigate Krane, Rubenstein and Joao for conflict of interest and the appearance of impropriety after their review of the 1st Department complaint.
The Cahill inquiry is apparently "still pending" under attorney Martin R. Gold who, insiders say, was directed to "sit on it…forever."
Earlier this year, FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. assigned additional agents to the Public Integrity Corruption squad at 26 Federal Plaza in Manhattan, and where agents have been actively conducting interviews.
Despite the Unanimous 5-0 Decision by the First Dept ordering Investigation of the Complaints then transferred to the Second Dept for investigation, the Second Dept DISMISSED the Complaints Summarily without Explanation or Investigation, failing to follow the Court Order thereby continuing to permit conflicts and misconduct and blocking due process once again. In fact, the Second Dept Chief Counsel, Kearse, admitted to direct conflicts with Krane of Proskauer and then acted on the matters failing to address the conflicts she had admitted too.
A few crime charts here will help show the connections to Proskauer in the Cover-Up crimes in both New York and Florida. New connections between the Virginia Commonwealth, the Virginia AG and Foley have recently been unearthed and have been reported to the USDC and USCA in my Lawsuit and new disciplinary complaints are being formulated for filing shortly.
Source and Full Article
0 comments:
Post a Comment