Raymond Anthony Joao – Misrepresented Proskauer Partner and Convicted Felon Marc Dreier Partner

2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Steven C. Krane to be moved for immediate investigation due to the appearance of impropriety and conflicts. The case was then transferred to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department where further conflicts with Krane were discovered that derailed the investigation and caused a flurry of further complaints against the Second Department members.

2004 09 07 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill’s cover letter transferring the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the unanimous decision by five justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department. Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is part of an ongoing investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and thus acts in conflict and violation of his public office. What is damning is that Cahill tries to impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not what the justices ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill tries to help himself and his buddies out of the mess again.

2004 07 12 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill’s Motion to move the complaints of Steven C. Krane and Proskauer, note this comes after Cahill has a filed complaint against him, making this further reason for another complaint against him.

2004 07 28 Cahill to move Krane.

2004 07 08 Iviewit Motion to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department regarding the conflicts and violations of public offices of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond A. Joao and requesting immediate investigation and to move the complaints.

2003 05 26 Iviewit Rebuttal to Raymond Joao attorney misconduct complaint. 1753 Pages BOOKMARKED

2003 04 16 Supreme Court of New York First Department Disciplinary Committee regarding reply to Raymond Joao complaint.

2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee response regarding Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Kenneth Rubenstein bar complaints which comes way late as it was lost in the mail. The document is probably fraudulent and tries to dismiss the complaints as a civil matter, although they ignore the state, federal and international crimes against the government and foreign nations exposed in the complaints.

2003 04 08 Raymond Joao’s response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo.

2003 02 25 Raymond Joao 9th district original attorney misconduct complaint - somehow gets transferred to the wrong district, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee for prosecution with the Proskauer attorney misconduct complaints, although Joao is registered elsewhere.

Raymond Anthony Joao

my Blog about Raymond A. Joao - to do with the Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent - Iviewit - www.DeniedPatent.com
Showing posts with label Raymond Joao. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Raymond Joao. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

MPEG LA, LLC - Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney - MPEG LA Stole iViewit Technology and Illegally Patent Pooled the Technology.

Kenneth Rubenstein to this day, covers up the FACT that he helped MPEG LA get control of the Iviewit Technology and illegally put this Patent into patent pools.

Kenneth Rubenstein is So Far above the LAW as protected by Judicial Corruption in New York. Kenneth Rubenstein was long since protected by Corrupt Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye who protected her then husband Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose Partner.

Here are Some Documents on Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose.

1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC. The meeting was in New York at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to refer Joao in his deposition. Filipek had questions regarding the patents he viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention.

Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose Law Firm will Soon have his Licensed Suspended, Will Be Indicted for Trillions in Fraud. And Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm and their Liability Insurance Carriers will pay Billions to Shareholders of Major Tech and Media Companies.

Below is Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP Perjured Deposition
Part 2 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rodS_EjIO6M
Part 3 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz58XzqDIOQ
Part 4 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIuERbs40c8
Part 5 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQbmAwr-oto
Part 6 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0_bN7IzaGA


November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose and MPEG LA's Deposition. Rubenstein perjures himself repeatedly regarding acting as Iviewit Patent Counsel, contradicts Christopher Wheeler Deposition Statements and statements made to Judge Jorge Labarga. Labarga had evidence of Perjured statements of Rubenstein and threw the lawsuit as he threw the Bush v. Gore Presidential Election and ended Democracy in the USA.

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger
Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Read more...

Friday, September 24, 2010

Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California v. Cathay Bank et. al.Complaint for Patent Infringement

"Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California

Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California, LLC
v. Cathay Bank et. al.Complaint for Patent Infringement


6,047,270: “Apparatus and method for providing account security” by Joao et. al. Prosecuted by Joao; Raymond A.. Includes 86 claims (12 indep.). Was application 08/918,284. Filed 8/25/1997 & Granted 4/4/2000.

Who ProtectsRaymond Joao's Patent Infringement Crimes ?

What Judges, Patent Attorneys, Wall of Corruption Protects the Patent Crimes of Raymond Joao www.RaymondJoao.com

Raymond Joao is GUILTY !! that is a Given, the only question is How Long will he be protected to commit more Patent Crimes jsut because of what he knows and who he knows it on .. with the Iviewit Technologies Patent Denial and Iviewit Intellectual Property Theft (www.DeniedPatent.com )

Got a Tip on Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California v. Cathay Bank et. al.Complaint for Patent Infringement ? Email your Tip To Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California v. Cathay Bank et. al.

Read more...

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Raymond A. Joao - Patent King - anti-theft devices and More... guess he Knows how to Steal Patents.. Where his Raymond Joao Now..

I mean where is Raymond A. Joao in the Industry. We know he is in Yonkers, Right?

anti-theft devices - to funny.. yet he is a Patent Thief..

""The concept guy
by LIBN Staff
Rose-Robin Pedone
Published: March 19, 1999

By day, he’s an attorney at Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Schlissel.

By night, Raymond Joao is a thriving inventor with 20 patents pending, seven already issued and two on the way.

Raymond A. Joao has patents and patents pending for everything from secure credit card transaction systems to anti-theft devices to a new kind of employee benefits program.

And it’s his benefits program that’s occupying much of Joao’s thinking right now. In conjunction with Benefitme.com, Joao’s IBA, or individual benefit account, will debut later this year and is designed to save companies with more than 100 employees as much as $80,000 annually, he says, after factoring in all of the costs of benefits management.

“It’s hard to take care of employees when they have questions,” Raymond Joao said. “There’s nothing out there to answer questions about medical benefits, 401k plans, vacation time or personal days.”

With Raymond Joao’s creation, employees can log onto a Web site and check on their benefits whenever they so desire.

“Once an IBA is established, there is no reason for that relationship to end once an employee leaves a job,” Raymond Joao said, “or even for the pricing to change.”

This program will create liquidity in the market, according to Raymond Joao. As a result, employees should be able to change their benefits options, or even their providers, whenever they want.

“Allowing employees to change providers will cause insurance companies to run better and more efficiently,” Raymond Anthony Joao said.

Benefitme.com, a Manhattan-based startup seeking venture capital and new digs, is expected to bring the IBA to the marketplace later this year.

“We are confident that it will revolutionize the way people manage their benefits,” said Benefitme.com CEO Michael R. Fox. “We are developing something unique in the marketplace.”

Benefitme.com, with about 12 partners, is now “in the stages of its formal formation,” according to Fox. However, he wants to make it clear that his company is not a startup looking to latch on to the coattails of super-hyped Internet companies that go public with a business plan, no product and only a prayer.

“We are building a very solid business with traditional revenue models in an online environment,” Joao said.

The company is about two months away from its first round of venture capital financing. To date, any money invested in the company has been strictly from the founders and has been used for development of the company’s infrastructure.

As the company grows, it will need an “official” headquarters. According to Fox, the partners are considering locations in Manhattan, Westchester and Long Island. Currently, however, Benefitme.com is concentration on the company’s first phase.

Initially, Benefitme.com will build an online benefits environment. Once that is established, it can “move forward to redefine what’s behind the scenes,” according to Fox.

In the meantime, Joao continues to apply for new patents. His most recent, granted earlier this month, is for a “transaction security apparatus and method.”

Developed with his best friend, Yonkers Police Officer Robert R. Bock, Joao’s idea is for a transaction device which will transmit a message to a cardholder’s two-way pager - or other high tech device - when a purchase is made with the credit card. Once the signal is received, the cardholder must approve the purchase for the transaction to go through.

“This will cut down tremendously on fraud,” Ray Joao said.

Besides lowering the fraudulent charge rate, Joao surmised that a company could issue these to its employees to track employee usage of company credit cards.

Joao and Bock are now seeking a company to either license the product or enter into a joint development with them. ""

Source:
http://libn.com/blog/1999/03/19/the-concept-guy/

Read more...

Sunday, January 3, 2010

Proskauer Rose Seems to Be In ALL the Big Scandals - and is ALWAYS above the Law

"Madoff, Dreier and Allen Stanford Ponzi Links to the Iviewit Affairs with proskauer all around.

At the heart of the unearthing of several of the largest financial scams in history, Bernard Madoff, Sir Allen Stanford and Marc S. Dreier, again we find the law firm Proskauer and their Iviewit referrals and co-conspirators such as Joao and other defendants in my lawsuit, central figures as indicated in the Crime Chart.

Again, perhaps these schemes are the money laundering schemes for the royalties from the stolen technologies, a place to park bribe money like Swiss bank accounts, perhaps including those recently involved in scandal with UBS whereby the names are soon to be released or just to hide the ill gained profits.

As you can imagine because my dreams and inventions have become realities for the world in transforming virtually all digital imaging and video applications, placing Multi-Media as a more important component of the digital world now than even the operating system, i.e. Microsoft’s Windows. Without the ability to play rich multi-media the operating system would have little use.

The amount of converted royalties generated from the technologies over the past decade, including invention of wholly new markets, is beyond imagination and had to be laundered somehow; recent scandals may provide the explanation.

The Sir Allen Stanford Financial Fraud and Ties to Proskauer
The Stanford Ponzi investigation may be the card that knocks down the house of cards at Proskauer. Uncovering of the $65 Billion Madoff Ponzi led the SEC & FBI to intensify investigations into Stanford; I quote the Times Online for the Committee,
‘Perhaps the most alarming is that Stanford Investment Bank has exposure to losses from the Madoff fraud scheme despite the bank's public assurance to the contrary’, said the SEC.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5759709.ece
The Wall Street Journal reported that CFO of Stanford Financial Group, James Davis, also involved in the $7 Billion Ponzi, pled Guilty to Federal charges while appearing to implicate counsel Proskauer & Partner Thomas Sjoblom orchestrating a plan to Obstruct SEC & FBI investigations into Stanford & more. Further information reveals blood oaths between regulators and Stanford to conceal the fraud from regulatory agencies and Stanford’s possible involvement with the number one MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL with Proskauer dead center and alleged in the crimes and Cover-Up crimes.

I have submitted in my Prepared Statement links to the Wall Street Journal and other articles relating to these links for the Committees further review.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/28/sjoblom-proskauer-rose-face-fallout-from-stanford-affair/

Ironically, Sjoblom worked for the SEC & now is implicated in FBI & SEC actions, advising client Stanford employees on “how” to lie to the SEC and further obstructive acts. Huffington Post on Feb 20, 09 claims, Sjoblom, a partner at law firm Proskauer Rose doing work for Stanford's company's Antigua affiliate, told authorities that he ‘disaffirmed’ everything he had told them to date...Sjoblom spent nearly 20 years at the SEC, & served as an Asst Chief Litigation Counsel in the SEC's Division of Enforcement from 1987-1999.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/charles-h-green/mini-madoff-scandal-scale_b_168486.html
The Committee should note the close proximity of dates between the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer’s acquisition of Sjoblom.

The Bernard Madoff Financial Fraud and Ties to Proskauer
If I may read again into the record from Bloomberg on Jan 14, 09,

The week after Bernard Madoff was charged with running a $50 billion Ponzi scheme, Proskauer Rose…offered a telephone briefing on the scandal for its wealthy clients. With only a day’s notice, 1,300 Madoff investors dialed in. ‘This is a financial 9/11 for our clients’, said Proskauer litigation partner Gregg Mashberg…‘People are dying for information.’

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aO32KOhrPtRw&refer=us
Following the “client” call, investigations began into major “clients” involved in Madoff, Proskauer having perhaps the most Madoff “clients”, many who originally claimed to be victims may now be accomplice.

From Fox Business, I quote, SEC OIG delivered a stinging report on Madoff harshly criticizing lax regulators for overlooking the Madoff information from WHISTLEBLOWERS & others inside the SEC, for years. http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/markets/industries/government/report-set-criticize-sec-madoff-scheme/

Proskauer has further ties to Madoff according to TPM, in 2004 an SEC attorney, Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot, notified the SEC of the Ponzi but was forced out of her job, the SEC later settling a claim filed by Lightfoot. Upon termination, Lightfoot turned over the Madoff file to Jacqueline Wood who then presumably buried the report that could have exposed the Ponzi in 04. The SEC OIG’s 477 page report mentions Wood of Proskauer throughout the entire report as a key figure in the regulatory failures, along with possible collusion of Madoff family members who married into the SEC. http://www.sec.gov/news/studies/2009/oig-509.pdf

TPM reports that after leaving the SEC, Wood took a Proskauer Partnership and I submit linkage for this Committee’s review in my Prepared Statement @ TPM @ http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/mrs_panstreppon/2009/07/bernie-madoff-sec-investigator.php?ref=reccafe .

According to Memphis Daily News, Laura Pendergest-Holt ( Wood ), Stanford’s CIO, criminally charged in the Stanford investigation, then filed a civil suit against Proskauer & Sjoblom claiming they “hung her out to dry” before the SEC.

Meanwhile, Sjoblom solicited a multi-million dollar retainer from now arrested Stanford Chairman, Allen Stanford, the night before the events with Holt took place at the SEC. http://www.memphisdailynews.com/editorial/Article.aspx?id=41707

The Wall Street Journal reports filing of a Class Action suit against Sjoblom & Proskauer in TX after Davis’ incriminating plea agreement implicating Proskauer, the Class Action seeking damages for the entire $7 Billion under TX Law in damages for Proskauer’s role Aiding & Abetting the Stanford Ponzi, I quote the Wall Street Journal Legal Blog by Amir Efrati,
The suit, filed in federal court in Dallas, says Sjoblom and Proskauer Rose are liable for $7 billion in damages for aiding and abetting Stanford’s alleged fraud…The civil suit is largely based on a plea agreement that we mentioned in this post yesterday, which focuses in part on the alleged actions of Sjoblom, who became outside counsel for Stanford’s international bank based in Antigua in the Caribbean starting in 2005.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/28/sjoblom-proskauer-rose-face-fallout-from-stanford-affair/

The Marc S. Dreier Financial Fraud and Ties to the Proskauer Law Firm
Another defendant in the Iviewit Lawsuit, convicted felon Marc S. Dreier, found orchestrating yet another bizarre Ponzi and in the Dreier scheme, we find yet again another former Proskauer Partner, Sheila M. Gowan, now acting as bankruptcy trustee in the suit as reported by the Wall Street Journal, attached to my Prepared Statement.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/01/02/former-ausa-selected-as-bankruptcy-trustee-in-dreier-case.

As already mentioned herein, Raymond Joao, the rival to Edison with patent applications dated in 1900, perhaps even claiming he invented electricity prior to Edison, then left Meltzer to Dreier, impersonating me as the inventor of my technologies.

It is fitting to note, or joke, here that Dreier was also caught in his scheme using fake and fraudulent names and representations of himself fraudulently impersonating others while trying to Launder stolen money into Canada.

It is known that during that time Raymond Joao made several deals and sales regarding inventions in his name, although details remain sketchy and under investigation.


http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+question&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Scandals
www.DeniedPatent.com
Proskauer

Read more...

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Enter William Dick of Foley to Replace Raymond Joao - Misrepresentation, Fraud, Lies, Deceit, IBM Connections and More..

"Once Raymond Joao was under “investigation” by Proskauer Rose he was then terminated from service by them, Proskauer instantly found an old friend of Christopher Wheeler’s, a one William Dick of Foley and Christopher Wheeler vouched for his friend William Dick to the Board of Directors.

William Dick, according to Christopher C. Wheeler was IBM’s Patent Counsel for IBM’s far eastern patent pool.

William Dick was also friends and former coworker at IBM and then again with Friedkin with another of Christopher Wheeler’s referrals to the Iviewit companies, Brian G. Utley, who was appointed President of the Iviewit companies whereby Christopher Wheeler had presented a falsified resume for Brian Utley to the Board, Shareholders and Investors, a falsified resume in several key ways.

First, the resume presented to the Board by Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer Rose claimed Brian Utley was a college graduate, in deposition Brian Utley utterly denies ever graduating.

The most important fraud on the resume though was on the point of his past employment whereby it stated that due to Brian Utley’s innovations for the company, Diamond Turf Equipment, owned by Monte Friedkin had grown to be one of the best and largest companies of its kind due to Brian Utley’s running that company.

Per Monte Friedkin, it was more like ruining the company, as when Monte Friedkin found Brian Utley, William Dick and Christopher Wheeler stealing Inventions from him, he fired Utley and closed the shop entirely down taking a several million dollar loss.

Major misrepresentation of Brian Utley by Proskauer’s Christopher C. Wheeler but even more astonishing is that the same crew of Brian Utley, Christopher Wheeler and William Dick were involved in the Monte Friedkin frauds.

Many perjured statements regarding these events were submitted to official investigatory bodies and courts and evidence of these perjurious statements have been included in the Exhibit and Linkage Section under the individuals names.

Prior to learning of their seedy past, which had been misrepresented to the Board, Investors and Shareholders, as neither Williamm Dick nor Christopher Wheeler disclosed their past history together at Friedkin’s with Brian G. Utley, nor did they share the information of the failed invention theft with anyone else.

Of course, if they did disclose the attempted theft, nobody would have retained them; everyone was in the dark as they handed out falsified resumes and financials to Investment Bankers, Iviewit Investors, Iviewit Shareholders, including the SBA and more.

Foley entered the scene under similar false pretenses with Christopher Wheeler vouching for William Dick’s integrity and again failing to notify anyone of their prior failed invention theft.

Instantly, Foley identified a mass of problems with Raymond Joao’s filing but claimed they could correct everything, such as missing assignments, missing inventors, missing patent disclosure information, etc.

Again, I myself and the Iviewit Board and Shareholders trusted yet another large law firm in the IP field referred again by Proskauer Rose and this time Foley assured Investors, Investment Banks and Shareholders that they could and would fix the problems with Raymond Joao’s filing and so they were retained, again, Proskauer’s Kenneth Rubenstein as oversight.

After several months, Brian Utley came to me and asked me to sign blank patent applications for filings the inventors had not reviewed, Brian Utley claiming they needed to be filed that day, which again was false, as they were not due for several days, Brian Utley persisting that the Inventors had no time for review and that he did not have the IP filing applications to review before signing and could not get them.

Noticing several large patent binders on his desk I went to pick them up with another founder and inventor of the Iviewit technologies, James Frazier Armstrong, and what was discovered inside them was both astonishing and criminal.

Inside the binders were intellectual property filings with now Brian Utley as sole inventor of technologies including for example an application titled “Zoom and Pan on a Digital Camera” and another “Zoom Image Design Applet” both inventions of which Brian Utley was not even employed at the time of invention.

Further, Brian Utley replaced original inventors on original patent filings, those filed incorrectly by Raymond Joao, Foley fraudulently replacing inventors Zakirul Shirajee and Jude Rosario with Brian Utley on filings, again Brian Utley was nowhere near the scene of invention.

Foley now found continuing the Joao fraud it appeared although at the time hard for almost anyone to believe.

Further, there were now two or more sets of patents, which almost were identical but were wholly different, as one set missed the inventions entirely and was fraught with bad math and major errors, the others with Utley’s name seemed to be the broader and more correct filings.

In fact, some of the IP found in the binders taken from Brian Utley were for Intellectual Properties already filed at US Patent Office without anyone’s knowledge, including the Inventors, Shareholders or the Board of Directors, patents that were solely ( or soullessly ) in Utley’s name, being sent to his home address, not Iviewit’s and more.

Almost identical to the Monte Friedkin theft whereby William Dick wrote Friedkin’s inventions into Brian Utley’s name and filed them into a corporation incorporated by Proskauer Rose and Christopher Wheeler, outside Friedkin’s employ and without Friedkin’s knowledge or consent.

These fraudulent applications led to immediate taped meetings regarding the fraudulent IP with Foley and Proskauer Partners, Board Members and Shareholders where it was further learned that assignments were missing, inventors were wrong and the patent applications remained filled with errors, I submit to the Committee under the Exhibits and Linkage section of the prepared statement a sample of the IP errors, contained in William Dick’s Virginia Bar Complaint Rebuttal.

Foley was to correct everything in time for the filings, the inventors then corrected the patents, and yet Foley still filed the fraudulent patents with the bad math and other fraudulent information, discarding the inventors’ changes and continuing the fraud. The cat was almost out of the bag at that time, yet it was almost impossible to believe that these were crimes and not some type of mistakes versus part of an organized criminal syndicate of lawyers and law firms attempting to steal inventions, which only later and still today are being unraveled. At the same time, other information indicating fraud began to surface.

The Arthur Andersen Audit, The Enron Broadband Attempted Technology Transfers, the Collapse of both Enron and Arthur Andersen and the Ties to the Iviewit Inventions:
Another hidden and fraudulent set of events within the Iviewit companies links to Enron Broadband discovered at the same time that Arthur Andersen began a required Audit of the Iviewit Companies performed on behalf of Crossbow Ventures and their corresponding interests of the SBA on their SBIC loans. Andersen’s Audit discovered identically and similarly named Corporate Shell companies and other misdeeds, as Iviewit also became aware of unauthorized technology transfers taking place by Utley, Dick and Wheeler that included one with Enron Broadband and Blockbuster Video.

Enron Broadband had booked Hundreds of Millions of Dollars in revenue on a future deal with Blockbuster Video to stream full screen full frame video over the Internet, that once the crimes at Iviewit were beginning to be discovered, fell apart overnight. Many of those who fully understand the Enron fraud understand that the Broadband division’s fraud was the “straw that broke the camels back.” As soon as no technology was to transfer in backdoor secret deals to stream or download the videos due to the investigations, and the scandal was unraveling quickly from the audits findings, everything Enron Broadband and Enron had done had to become extinct overnight. Problem, they already had booked the revenue having forgotten the age-old proverb, “Don't count your chickens before they are hatched”, as greed often blinds the best and brightest too.

I note as an aside that the founder of Blockbuster, Wayne Huizenga and his Son, were the seed investors in the Iviewit companies brought to Iviewit by Proskauer and now named Defendants in my Federal Lawsuit. Instantly, almost overnight, with discovery of the Iviewit fraud, both Andersen who was in the midst of the Iviewit audit that was revealing fraud and Enron vanished in scandal, in a trail of criminal document shredding to cover their tracks. Seeing the danger they were in from the exposure of the crimes, our trusted advisors, our retained lawyers and accountants, then began a document shredding of the Iviewit files to rid the evidence of the illegal technology transfers and other evidence revealing their criminal acts.

Similar to what Anderson now describes taking place in the First Department regarding the Cover-Up crimes alleged. According to Iviewit Employees stolen briefcases of cash of investor monies, including the SBA’s money, then used to bribe and attempt to bribe employees to steal proprietary equipment and trade secrets as indicated in one employees written statement contained in the referenced link in my Prepared Statement Submitted to this Committee @ http://Iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/SHAREHOLDER%20STATEMENTS%20BOOKMARKED.pdf

Witness testimony on page 10 or found on the Iviewit Homepage under Evidence Link 784. "


Source of Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Proskauer Sucks
Also Check Out www.Iviewit.TV for More on this Proskauer Rose Deceit...
Kenneth Rubenstein
The William Dick Bar Rebuttal from Eliot Bernsten is at the Link Below.

William Dick submitted documents which the patent office claimed where fraudulent which led to suspension and investigation.

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2004%2003%2012%20William%20Dick%20Virginia%20Bar%20Complaint%20Response%20BOOKM.pdf
Proskauer

Read more...

Enter the Law Firm Proskauer - Christopher Clarke Wheeler of Proskauer - Proskauer was then retained for protecting the Intellectual Properties.

"First on the scene of these Historical Inventions in Boca Raton, Florida, Christopher Clarke Wheeler of Proskauer, Proskauer Rose was then retained for protecting the Intellectual Properties, including protecting them worldwide via Patents, Trademarks, Trade-Secrets and Copyrights. For example, Wheeler misrepresented to the Iviewit companies that attorney Kenneth Rubenstein was a Partner at Proskauer when introducing him.

Yet, to the contrary, investors found Kenneth Rubenstein was instead at the law firm of Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolfe & Schlissel ( Meltzer ) on Long Island at the time, Kenneth Rubenstein , now one of the many named Defendants in my Twelve Trillion dollar RICO and Anti-Trust suit “legally related” to Anderson. Why would Proskauer misrepresent that Rubenstein was a partner who would protect the properties when in fact he was with another firm?

The answer revolves around the fact that Proskauer at the time of learning of the inventions had NO Patent or Intellectual Property Department and was mainly a real estate law firm. If they were planning from the start to steal the “Holy Grail” technologies, they would need a patent department to monetize the royalties for themselves.

Turns out that Kenneth Rubenstein, an attorney admitted and regulated by the NYS First Dept, while at Meltzer, simultaneously was involved with the MPEGLA Patent Pool that he was in house counsel for and one of the founders of the MPEGLA pooling scheme.

Proskauer then set about to find for their benefit, not their clients benefit, Rubenstein, to apply the technologies to the MPEGLA patent pools and more for themselves. After finding Rubenstein, Proskauer introduced him as Proskauer’s Partner for the Oversight and Protection of the Inventions and the main IP Litigator who would get the IP protected and then placed in the MPEGLA pools for royalties to the Iviewit investors.

Misrepresented Proskauer partner Raymond Joao was retained to complete the Intellectual Property filing work in the US and every country around the world for IP protections.

Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao thought initially to be Proskauer Rose partners in New York working to protect the Iviewit Inventions took invention disclosures from the inventors, opined on the technologies under Proskauer’s retainer for services at the time, while they were actually working on the MPEGLA Patent Pools at Meltzer and were not with Proskauer Rose at all.

Once investors discovered Proskauer’s misrepresentation of Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao as Proskauer partners, when instead with the law firm Meltzer, Kenneth Rubenstein quickly switched firms to Proskauer Rose LLP.

Christopher Wheeler claiming that Proskauer ROse was in the process of acquiring Kenneth Rubenstein and virtually overnight Kenneth Rubenstein jumped ship with almost the entire Meltzer IP group to Proskauer Rose.

Details of Kenneth Rubenstein’s transfer were not clear to Rubenstein or Wheeler in their depositions related to these matters; in fact, Rubenstein was even unclear as to the terms of his partnership deal.

The net result of these fraudulent misrepresentations was that it now gave Proskauer, Iviewit Patent Counsel, control of the MPEGLA patent pooling schemes, putting Proskauer in direct competition with Iviewit via control of MPEGLA.

MPEGLA now the largest infringer of the Iviewit technologies through this massive Conflict of Interest created by Violations of Virtually All Attorney Conduct Codes and Law by the Attorneys.

A Conflict of Interest almost surreal in nature since attorneys are typically retained as “trusted” advisors considering there are supposed to be very strict federal Patent Bar and State Bar Association rules that presumably prevent lawyers and law firms from these type of conflicts with their trusting clients.

Raymond Joao on the other hand, also misrepresented as Kenneth Rubenstein’s Proskauer Partner and filing lackey was also instead working with Rubenstein at the Meltzer firm but he did not transfer from Meltzer to Proskauer Rose with Kenneth Rubenstein and the rest of the Meltzer team. Raymond Joao was to transfer to Proskauer Rose after cleaning up loose ends at Meltzer according to Wheeler.

Yet, Raymond Joao never made it that far, as within the first year of his work on the IP, it became learned that Joao might have been patenting inventions in his own name, inventions learned under disclosure and retainer with Iviewit and the Inventors.

Proskauer Rose and Christopher Wheeler confronted with the initial rumors that Raymond Joao, their operate, was filing patents wrongly on behalf of the Inventors and perhaps the right ones for himself instead. Wheeler of Proskauer volunteered to investigate Joao and was then further retained and billed for investigating the initial allegations that Joao was missing filings for Iviewit while busy patenting them in his name.

Raymond Joao the attorney Proskauer Rose referred and retained for Iviewit whom they had misrepresented to Investors and Board Members initially as a Proskauer partner, never made the conversion to Proskauer, terminated by Proskauer from Iviewit and then Raymond Joao left Meltzer and took a new position with now recently Convicted Felon Marc S. Dreier ( Dreier ). Marc Dreier convicted in a Ponzi scheme second only to that of Bernard Madoff ( Madoff ) and Sir Robert Allen Stanford ( Stanford ).

While advising the Iviewit companies on the Intellectual Properties, which posed a competitive threat to MPEGLA, including possible extinction of the MPEGLA pool without a license from Iviewit; Rubenstein, Proskauer and Meltzer then failed to put up a China Wall to protect the Inventions from this MASSIVE Conflict of Interest between Proskauer, Rubenstein and Proskauer’s new client MPEGLA & Iviewit.

Instead, they did the exact opposite and allowed MPEGLA to use the IP for their benefit while using Anti-Competitive Monopolistic practices to eliminate the Inventors and the Iviewit Companies and Shareholders. Perhaps, Joao’s 90+ patents were to be included in the MPEGLA patent pooling scheme by Kenneth Rubenstein, so that royalties could then be shared disproportionately with other inventors in the pool, 90+ patents giving a large share of the divided license royalties from the pool.

With Kenneth Rubenstein as Patent Counsel and the sole Patent Gatekeeper to the MPEGLA IP pools, it would be a no brainer, if Joao had not happened to get caught and a snowball of other crimes began surfacing at about the same time which led to uncovering evidence of a massive criminal enterprise operating within and controlling certain government agencies, law enforcement agencies and courts.

No wonder the Justice Department has historically broken up patent pooling schemes using Anti-Trust regulations, as this form of pooling works to deny ma and pa inventors of their Article 1, Sec 8, Clause 8, inventor rights.

Intellectual Property Rights protected at the top of the Constitution, I quote,

United States Constitution Article 1, Sec 8, Clause 8

The Congress shall have power To…Promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

These Inventor Protections are the cornerstone of Free Commerce in the United States. In the past, allegations of pooling schemes actually in the business of murdering inventors to steal their inventions or other such heinous crimes discovered have led to the breakup of patent pools like RCA’s and Singer Sewing’s in order to protect inventors.

Typically Inventors need Constitutional Protection, the only civil job protected explicity by the Constitution, is due to corporations attempting to deny royalties through heavy handed methods not ones lawyers trying to steal their clients inventions. "


Source of This Post
http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:ktIVkVh6K68J:www.iviewit.tv/20091005%2520NY%2520Judiciary%2520Committee%2520Prepared%2520Statement.doc+site://www.iviewit.tv+Reardon&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Proskauer ROse Sucks

Read more...

Web Stats - Wildman, Harrold, Allen, and Dixon

Chicago, Illinois, United States
Wildman, Harrold, Allen, & Dixon
(66.28.243.126)

Read more...

Monday, December 28, 2009

Raymond Joao, Esquire - General Complaint

"Raymond A. Joao, (hereinafter "Joao"), believed to be a resident of the State of New
York, and who at various times relevant hereto was initially misrepresented to the
Company as a partner of Proskauer Rose LLP (hereinafter “Proskauer”) and was factually
a partner of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein and Schlissel, and who provided legal services to
the Company.

Moreover, beginning on or about September of 1998, the Company, through its agent and
principal, Eliot I. Bernstein ("Bernstein"), began negotiations with Proskauer with regard
to Proskauer providing legal services to the Company the purpose of which was to
develop and market specific technologies developed by Bernstein and two others, which
technologies allowed for the scaling, enlargement, panning and zooming of digital
images and video without degradation to the quality of the digital image due to what is
commonly referred to as “pixelation”, the delivery of digital video using proprietary
scaling techniques, a combination of the image pan and zoom techniques and video
scaling techniques, and the remote control of video and image applications."

Furthermore, Bernstein engaged the services of Proskauer and in turn Joao, among
others, through an engagement letter a true copy of which I attach herein as Exhibit “A”,
to obtain multiple patents and oversee US and foreign filings for such technologies
including the provisional filings for the technologies as described above, and such other
activities as were necessary to protect the intellectual property.

Additionally, upon information and belief, Joao upon viewing the technologies developed
by Bernstein, and held by the Company, realized the significance of the technologies, its
various applications to communication networks for distributing video data and images
and for existing digital processes, including, but not limited to digital cameras, digital
video disks (DVD), digital imaging technologies for medical purposes and digital video,
and that Rubenstein designed and executed, sometimes for himself or others similarly
situated, deceptions, improprieties, and, even in certain circumstances, outright
malfeasances by the disingenuous insertion of his own interests or the interests of third
parties, who were other clients of Proskauer and/or Meltzer Lippe Goldstein and
Schlissel, between the Company, as his client and together with its disclosed techniques,
and the ultimate end users of its future OEM and other licensees, to the detriment and
damage of the Company. Many of the malfeasances against the Company have also
involved fraud against the US Patent and Trademark Office."


Source and Full Document: Starting at Page 1132
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2005%2026%20Iviewit%20Rebuttal%20to%20Joao%20Response%20BOOKMARKED.pdf
Raymond Joao

How Can these Kinds of Crimes Find No One Accountable? Easy, in a justice system based on Opinion, based on Who you know and who you pay and NOT based on the Truth of any Particular Case. I have seen huge cases with plenty of proof and the guy who committed the crime and well there really was no doubt, he walked.

It is time to take back our courts... I have seen Jury trials award Big money for Crimes of Big Companies, only to have a Judge overturn the Award... so I say why bother wasting tax payers money on a Jury Trial and you taking time of work to go to it - if what you say does not matter? The Justice System is Not set up with the right checks and balances to see that crimes actually have someone accountable for them. However, I have seen the Justice System work amazing on Setting up the "Good Guy" to Quiet the Them Down.

It is Time for YOU to Speak up and to STOP Elite Law Firms, Rogue Attorneys, and Major Political Connections from ruining the lives of innocent Americans.

Attorneys Above the Law - No More.... it is Time for We the People to Make a Stand and Say Enough is Enough, we witness this stuff in Small Towns and Big Cities across this land and we find ourselves helpless as when you speak out, your life is ruined, your given the Scarlet Letter per say... your business is ruined .. and oftentimes local courts - cops and judges set you up to protect the Political Elite, Pay back Favors and to Stay in Power...

It is not only time to Know, time to Expose and time to Pay Attention but it is Time to do something about it. Soon we will talk about how you can file complaints within the Civil Code of your State, and how you can be your own attorney and hold guys like Raymond Joao accountable for what they do to Ruin lives and take advantage of their position....

Time to Make a Stand Folks...

Raymond Joao - You Lose !!!
The Truth Will WIN !!
Raymond Anthony Joao

Read more...

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Proskauer Rose - Crime Accusations - Coverups - Scandals - Names and Players Chart

Click Below to see A Chart of Who the Players of
this High Finance, Stolen Patent Conspiracy are.

r
The Document Below is from www.IviewIt.TV
and shows you Proskauer Rose, Gerald R. Lewin, Brian Utley, Christopher Wheeler,Crossbow Ventures, MPEGLA LLC, Foley and Lardner Llp, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and More Players in all this and how they fit into the Greatest Caper of this Century, the Stealing of a Trillion Dollar Patent.
r
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CRIME%20ORG%20CHARTS%201.htm
p

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf

k

Read more...

Raymond Joao, Esq.

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT FIRST DEPARTMENT COURT ORDER FOR INVESTIGATION OF JOAO

REBUTTAL TO RAYMOND JOAO BAR COMPLAINT RESPONSE


REPRESENTED WITH PROSKAUER BUT ALSO WITH MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN WOLFE AND SCHLISSEL

(and again I use Esq. improperly whereas it should be Esqueer)

Raymond Anthony Joao, the Patent Attorney with 90 patents in his name, all to do with the Iviewit inventions, what more can be said, asssshole. Most famous patent with Rubenstein as co-inventor "System & Method for Fraud on the United States Patent & Trademark Office." (footnote to that link, this was done in the very beginning of piecing together the evidence trail when very little was known, maybe). Imagine that, we formed our initial complaint against the attorneys involved, to the patent office, in the form of a patent filing for how to commit fraud on the patent office, pretty funny and it illustrates my dark side. Ray once told me that he had dreams of his father after his death that haunted him, may I replace his father for his crimes against the children. His bar complaint rebuttal was handled by Steven C. Krane, former President of the New York State Bar Association, senior member of the New York bar disciplinary departments, Proskauer partner, Iviewit shareholder and fat unethical bastard, who acted in conflict, violating public office, a public office of ethics no less, to represent Proskauer partners and himself in the complaints filed in New York against them, with no disclosure of his conflicts or that he had roles at the Supreme Court First Department or that his tenure as bar President at the time precluded him from representing any bar complaints and oh what a can of worms is unfolding from his getting caught and his crimes to dodge investigation.

Joao's response to the evidence against him was to have Krane, the most influential member of the disciplinary departments in New York and Proskauer partner, handle his complaint in conflict and violation of his public offices. The conflict and violation of public office was the only way to get out of this for Joao. Now that the conflict was discovered and Krane, Joao and Rubenstein were ordered by five Justices unanimously for investigation, we shall see how long they breathe free air. Tick Tock.



Read more...

Proskauer Rose - Crime Accusations - Coverups - Scandals - Names and Players Chart

Click Below to see A Chart of Who the Players of
this High Finance, Stolen Patent Conspiracy are.

r
The Document Below is from www.IviewIt.TV
and shows you Proskauer Rose, Gerald R. Lewin, Brian Utley, Christopher Wheeler,Crossbow Ventures, MPEGLA LLC, Foley and Lardner Llp, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao and More Players in all this and how they fit into the Greatest Caper of this Century, the Stealing of a Trillion Dollar Patent.
r
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/rico/CRIME%20ORG%20CHARTS%201.htm
p

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf

k

Read more...

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe - Clerk of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court - Steven Krane - Thomas Cahill - Raymond Joao

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe

Read more...

Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose Claimed No Knowledge of Iviewit - is that the Story your Going With?

Can it possibly be True that with all the proof and evidence out there that Proskauer Rose - Kenneth Rubenstein could claim to have know knowledge of Iviewit?

I mean wasn't there contracts, bills, emails, texts, phone calls, documents... What?

Uh.. I don't them, ya I happen to control their technology but that was just a coincidence...

More Tidbits on Kenneth Rubenstein's statement to the Court of No Knowledge of Iviewit.

*Wheeler Letter to Investors Regarding Proskauer Rose's Review of Technologies.

* Hassan Regarding Rubenstein

* Proskauer Rose - Wheeler letter relating to patent services

* Kenneth Rubenstein whereabouts unknown immediately after learning of Iviewit moves from MLGS to Proskauer Rose, Letter to Wheeler who is Rubenstein.

* Kenneth Rubenstein Directs Raymond Joao who he claims is coming to Proskauer Rose with him from MLGS and Joao's statment to the Bar contradicts this. Factually, after meeting with Iviewit Proskauer Rose buys MLGS entire patent department which specializes in Iviewit Niche.

* Kenneth Rubenstein as advisor to MPEG - COI that is never disclosed since Iviewit thought Kenneth Rubenstein - Proskauer Rose was their "counsel", Kenneth Rubenstein repeatedly stated with Wheeler that the patent pools will soon pay royalities on the Iviewit Techs.

Source and Full Document.
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf
r
r

Read more...

Raymond A. Joao Complaint

" Raymond A. Joao, (hereinafter "Joao"), believed to be a resident of the State of New
York, and who at various times relevant hereto was initially misrepresented to the
Company as a partner of Proskauer Rose LLP (hereinafter “Proskauer”) and was factually
a partner of Meltzer Lippe Goldstein and Schlissel, and who provided legal services to
the Company.

Moreover, beginning on or about September of 1998, the Company, through its agent and
principal, Eliot I. Bernstein ("Bernstein"), began negotiations with Proskauer with regard
to Proskauer providing legal services to the Company the purpose of which was to
develop and market specific technologies developed by Bernstein and two others, which
technologies allowed for the scaling, enlargement, panning and zooming of digital
images and video without degradation to the quality of the digital image due to what is
commonly referred to as “pixelation”, the delivery of digital video using proprietary

scaling techniques, a combination of the image pan and zoom techniques and video
scaling techniques, and the remote control of video and image applications.

Furthermore, Bernstein engaged the services of Proskauer and in turn Joao, among
others, through an engagement letter a true copy of which I attach herein as Exhibit “A”,
to obtain multiple patents and oversee US and foreign filings for such technologies
including the provisional filings for the technologies as described above, and such other
activities as were necessary to protect the intellectual property.

Additionally, upon information and belief, Raymond Joao upon viewing the technologies developed by Eliot Bernstein and the Iviewit Company, and held by the Company, realized the significance of the technologies, its various applications to communication networks for distributing video data and images and for existing digital processes, including, but not limited to digital cameras, digital video disks (DVD), digital imaging technologies for medical purposes and digital video.

And that Kenneth Rubenstein designed and executed, sometimes for himself or others similarly situated, deceptions, improprieties, and, even in certain circumstances, outright malfeasances by the disingenuous insertion of his own interests or the interests of third parties, who were other clients of Proskauer Rose and/or Meltzer Lippe Goldstein and Schlissel, between the Company, as his client and together with its disclosed techniques, and the ultimate end users of its future OEM and other licensees, to the detriment and
damage of the Company.

Many of the malfeasances against the Company have also
involved fraud against the US Patent and Trademark Office.


Specifics of General Complaint

Where the Company employed Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel for purposes of representing the Company to obtain multiple patents and oversee foreign filings for such technologies including the provisional filings for the technologies as
described above, and that pursuant to such employment, Raymond Anthony Joao, Proskauer Rose and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel owed a duty to ensure that the rights and interests of the Company were protected, Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose LLP and Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel neglected that reasonable duty of care in the performance of legal services in that they:
r
a. Failed to take reasonable steps to ensure that the intellectual property of the Company
was protected; and,
r
b. Failed to and/or inadequately completed work regarding patents, copyrights and
trademarks; and,
r
c. Failed to list proper inventors of the technologies based on improper legal advise by
Proskauer, and in turn Joao in his lead technological role, that foreign inventors could not
be listed until their immigration status was adjusted leading to further erroneous billings
by Proskauer for frivolous immigration work. This resulted in the failure of the patents to
include their rightful and lawful inventors; and,
r

d. Failed to ensure that the patent applications for the technologies, contained all
necessary and pertinent information relevant to the technologies and as required by law;
and,
r

e. Falsified billing statements and transmitted documents, and,
r
f. Falsified patent documents and changed the contents of patents prior to filing so as to
make the Company patents weak and inaccurate, so as to file patents in his own name
that would succeed upon the Companies patents failing. That Mr. Joao who was
contracted to procure patents for the Company has now applied for 70+ patents in his
own name, many of which appear to be ideas learned while representing the Company.
r
g. That due to the discovery of many of the above described events the Company’s lead
investor Crossbow Ventures (a referral of Proskauer Rose) of West Palm Beach, Fla.,
pulled funding on the Company.
e
Lastly, the negligent actions of Raymond Anthony Joao, MLGS and Proskauer Rose resulted in and were the proximate cause of loss to the Company; today, the Company’s processes are believed to be on digital camera’s, DVD’s and virtually all Internet and Broadcast streams of video; true copies of exhibits and witnesses are available on request and/or I will, on behalf of the Company, present them according to proof at commencement of investigation into
this General Complaint.

Due to the highly sensitive nature of the patent and copyright materials, exhibits and
witnesses will be provided once formal protections have been established in regard to this
complaint. "
r
Eliot Bernstein
Iviewit.com, Inc

Source of Post
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/2003%2002%2025%20Joao%209th%20district%20original%20complaint.pdf

t

Read more...

Iviewit has also discovered a multi-layered scheme and artifice to defraud shareholders

"Iviewit has also discovered a multi-layered scheme and artifice to defraud shareholders via a complex corporate shell game whereby two sets of identical companies were formed and two sets of patents were filed.

Whereby one set of patents was bogus and put into the companies owned by the shareholders and the other set of patents containing the core inventions was put into companies dubiously formed with identical names to the shareholder companies.

The ownership of the shadow companies appears none other than the law firm of Proskauer Rose LLP and other unknowns at this time. Shareholders were notified of the crimes in a shareholder communication dated April 2004 identifying much of the information discovered relating to the crimes, (SHAREHOLDER LETTER IDENTIFYING CRIMES AND GUILTY PARTIES - 3meg file, patience is mandatory).

The crimes have been reported to Federal, State and International authorities and ongoing investigations into the crimes are underway, whereby including but not limited to: the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the USPTO OED which regulates licensed patent attorneys, the Inspector Generals Office of the Federally Backed Small Business Administration, the Boca Raton Florida PD in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Florida Department of Professional Regulation, the AICPA, the European Patent Office (EPO) and its attorney regulatory body the Institute of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office (IPR).

Additionally, to no avail due to conflicts of interest, violations of public office and a denial of due process that precludes even filing complaints against them, the complaints none-the-less were filed with the state bar associations of New York, Florida and Virginia.

All been apprised of the criminal activities that have taken place, all have failed to investigate our allegations and New York and Florida bar and state Supreme Court agency members have been caught in conflict handling the complaints.

The company has compiled a list of crimes that have been filed with federal, state and international authorities showing the vast number of crimes that have been committed in the theft of the Iviewit intellectual properties.

Where such crimes include not only fraud against the Iviewit shareholders and inventors but fraud upon federal, state and international agencies, including but not limited to: the United States Patent & Trademark Office, the United States Copyright Office, the Federal Bankruptcy court, the Florida and Delaware State Departments, the Florida and New York Supreme Courts, the Federally backed Small Business Administration, a civil court in Florida, the European Patent Office (and the thirty or so representative countries that comprise such EPO) and the Japanese Patent Office.

Check out the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department court orders for investigation of the former President of the New York State Bar Association Steven C. Krane by clicking on his picture for the document. This is the price of gluttony and greed and why the almighty one has deemed such a sin.

Krane, who is the epitome of ethics has lost his way and acted in conflict of interest and abuse of public office with both the First Department Disciplinary Committee and the New York State Bar Association in representing his partners while maintaining conflicting public office positions in the New York Supreme Courts and NYSBA. Although his investigation has been temporarily de-railed, it will one day be completed as a formal investigation.

Yet, while Krane clerked for Chief Justice of the New York Court of Appeals, Judith Kaye, who by the by, is married to a Proskauer partner, Stephen Kaye, who is one of the accused Proskauer partners in the Intellectual Property Department (formed after learning of the Iviewit inventions), it looks like such forces are blocking the court ordered investigation through yet another series of conflicts and abuses in the investigating department.

Where it appears that Proskauer Rose has positioned deep within the ethics departments and courts to block due process and stave off the inevitable. Yet, as you read on, even these further desperate attempts to block prosecution have uncovered further conflicts which have only caused more people to become ensnared in the web of crimes and further complaints to be filed.
Florida Bar Complaints
Where those complaints in some instances have been refused to file and docket by members of the departments acting to block complaints against themselves inapposite of the laws of those states. Can you imagine, complaints filed against public officers where such officers than deny the complaints with out formal procedure, sounds like the old communist regime where citizens where unable to complain about their elected officials.

It does not sound like the good old USofA where we have a constitutional right to complain against our elected officials when they are found guilty of abuse of public office and as citizens we have an obligation to our country to file such charges. Yet, the onion is peeling and desperate times call for desperate measures.

And all the kings lawyers,
And all the kings men,
Couldn't put Proskauer Rose back together again.

Where once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer has gone through elaborate steps to obstruct justice and deny due process of complaints against them.
Through abuses of public office positions and a series of diabolical conflicts of interests at Supreme Court bar associations and in a civil court in Florida, where initial complaints were filed, including a counter complaint.
Florida Bar Complaints
The counter complaint was denied to be allowed and in this civil billing case Proskauer won through a default judgment after the judge dismissed two sets of Iviewit counsel and granted Proskauer a victory for Iviewit's failure to retain replacement counsel.
This case will be appealed pending information from the investigations, because as it turns out, Iviewit defended companies it did not own, as Proskauer appears to have sued the companies they fraudulently set up to own the stolen patents.
Florida Bar Complaints
That once caught stealing the patents, Proskauer made a desperate attempt to rid the shell companies that they had put the stolen IP into and gain control of the assets through a lawsuit claiming monies owed, while their management referrals tried and involuntary bankruptcy claiming monies owed. In fact, the company was not even aware that Proskauer Rose and their management had taken such actions.
Florida Bar Complaints
The company was notified by members of AOLTW/WB while seeking a twenty five million dollar raise that such legal actions were found while doing their due-diligence but the company was never made aware they were even lawsuits or bankruptcy, as these were for companies named similar and identical to the shareholder companies but not owned by the shareholders.
Upon learning of the legal actions and involuntary bankruptcy the company through a friend and hero (and you will learn of many who have helped carry the torch this far through personal sacrifice and risk), Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esq. fired the counsel we were unaware we had and filed the counter complaint in the civil case and filed in the bankruptcy.
Florida Bar Complaints
We retained new counsel, Steven Selz, Esq., Greenberg Traurig, and others to begin to peel the onion and file back but Judge Jorge Labarga would not allow us to present our case and through denying due process and procedure threw the case.
All prior counsel was fired that had been prior representing the companies without authorization and this new team took over the cases. At the time, it was not known that two sets of identical companies had been set up and that the companies we were now defending were not owned by the shareholders but by the companies lawyers.
Florida Bar Complaints
Therefore, Iviewit at the time thought that it was representing companies that its shareholders owned. It was not until the USPTO found that certain patents listed by the attorneys as assets of the Iviewit companies, where not in fact owned or assigned to the parties the attorneys listed on the IP dockets, (USPTO LETTER SHOWING THAT CERTAIN IP ASSETS THOUGHT TO BE IVIEWIT ASSETS ARE OTHERS) that evidence of the multi-layered corporate and patent shell scheme began to surface.
Florida Bar Complaints
Identically named companies, as illustrated in the Company History section, were formed to transfer stolen IP in the wrong inventors names and with no assignment or ownership to shareholders; fascinating, like a shell game of hide the real patents.
Upon attempting to ascertain why the patents were all wrong in inventors, assignees, owners and content, it was learned that dual named corporations were set up and again the information has been forwarded to state and federal authorities and the company is awaiting the outcome of these investigations.

Federal and international authorities have been notified that the organization MPEGLA LLC and other patent pools now controlled by our former Proskauer patent attorneys are acting as anti-competitive and monopolistic criminal enterprises to further aid in the theft and proliferation of the Iviewit inventions through a tying and bundling scheme.
Florida Bar Complaints
This scheme denies paying royalties to the Iviewit Shareholders including the SBA. Why, you may ask, is Proskauer Rose, LLP a former real estate firm since the 1800's, suddenly controlling patent pools that directly infringe upon the Iviewit inventions, after Proskauer learned of the inventions directly from the inventors?
Florida Bar Complaints
In fact, Proskauer attorney Kenneth Rubenstein, a member of the Advisory Board for Iviewit and lead patent counsel to MPEGLA LLC, is now trying to claim that he never heard of Iviewit under deposition (Rubenstein Deposition) and sworn statements to a civil court. Where evidence shows Rubenstein's direct involvement, Rubenstein is found to be a BIG FAT LIAR (Click Ken's picture for his Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department court ordered investigation by ruling of five Justices).
Florida Bar Complaints
Evidence such as his name in the Iviewit billings and letters from executives of AOLTW/WB showing that he opined favorably on the patents to induce investment from them, contradicts his perjured deposition. Evidence like his name as an Advisory Board Member in a Wachovia Private Placement Memorandum, co-authored, disseminated and billed for by his firm Proskauer and hosts of other evidence clearly showing his knowledge and involvement.
Florida Bar Complaints
When confronted under deposition with such evidence, Rubenstein refused to answer direct deposition questions (at his civil billing case) and left his deposition stating that we would have to have the court order him back to answer questions that directly affect the shareholders.
The court did order him back to the answer the questions but before he could be re-deposed the civil case trial was thwarted by the judge. Iviewit after being released of retained counsel by the judge never got the opportunity.
Florida Bar Complaints
Kenneth Rubenstein who swears under deposition, under sworn statements to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division: First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee and in a written statement to Judge Jorge Labarga of the civil court in Florida to have never heard of Iviewit, the Iviewit inventions or inventors; cannot be the same Kenneth Rubenstein opining favorably on the Iviewit patents to AOLTW/WB (click here for AOLTW/WB letter dusting Rubenstein's statements and exposing him for perjury).

Of course in good time we will get to Rubenstein's lackey, attorney Raymond Anthony Joao, who was a patent attorney working under Rubenstein's direction.
Florida Bar Complaints
Raymond Joao now claims 90 patents in his own name and Iviewit gives him kudos as the greatest slime ball inventor and patent attorney.
Florida Bar Complaints
No really, Iviewit considers our former counselors Joao and Rubenstein to be nothing more than co-inventors of a system and method to defraud shareholders and inventors of their inventions and commit fraud upon worldwide patent intellectual property organizations, an invention that should carry some stiff federal sentences.
Click here for a press article on the amazing inventiveness of Joao . Joao was so non-inventive that many of these patents resemble ideas and concepts lifted straight from the Iviewit business plan and invention disclosures and ideas that he was supposed to be patenting for the inventors and shareholders.

Much time was wasted causing losses of investors and inventors rights to the Intellectual Properties, perhaps permanently, by the railroading of complaints filed against the attorneys involved in thefts.
Where Proskauer partners were found violating state Supreme Court public office positions and representing their partners while holding public offices that directly prohibited their representations under conflict laws and other state laws in complaints filed against them. How they have staved off prosecution of confirmed conflicts of interest and Supreme Court of New York court ordered investigations, is just more abuse of public offices and further denial of due process through manipulation of the laws they are supposed to be upholding, but fascinating nonetheless.
How high to the crimes elevate, how much more can shareholders be denied of due process is a question of who exactly is spearheading the efforts to continue this hoax on shareholders.
If in fact, denials of due process are found in Justice or the Courts further, it would appear that after Inspector General reports and Department of Commerce investigations that perhaps only a President could be capable of placing people in these roles to block our efforts. If this is found to be the case shareholder claims will have to elevate to a complaint against the administration and those involved in the crimes or cover up of the crimes, to be appropriately titled Patentgate.

The state bars in New York and Florida investigations where thwarted by a series of conflicts of interests and improprieties. Proskauer attorneys violated public office positions in those states to derail investigations. Uncovered after almost two years, after delay after delay of the investigations was achieved through the conflicts, the Florida case against Wheeler and Triggs has reached the United States Supreme Court in an appeal of the Florida Supreme Courts decision in case SC04-1078 and Case Status.
Florida Supreme Court's failure to regulate and discipline attorney's caught in violation of public offices and failure to follow procedures established by the Florida Constitution for dealing with attorney misconduct as regulated by the Florida Bar and over sighted by the Supreme Court of Florida (SCF) is the cause of the case on appeal to the United States Supreme Court, that the Supreme Court of the United States denied to hear, leaving the shareholders with no forum to file complaints against Triggs for his public office violation of a Florida Supreme Court rule?
Perhaps this is why Sandra Day O'Connor upon fleeing the United States Supreme Court with death threats levied against her and Ginsburg, stated this country was in the throws of a dictatorship that should be stopped sooner than later.

Take a moment to honor the original conspirator, Christopher Clark Wheeler, one of the main suspects and ringleaders of the crime who has subsequently been charged with a Felony Driving Under the Influence Charge with Injury making his credibility as an attorney further mired in crimes. An arrest warrant was been issued in that matter, click Wheeler's picture on the left for the Delray Beach Police Department report or this link - Wheeler's arrest report or this one for the PD blotter.
So where his more serious crimes, like fraud on a whole bunch of government agencies and foreign nations now landed Iviewit and its shareholders at the United States Supreme Court to present our case for violations of public office by Wheeler and Triggs, Wheeler going with this further public nuisance crime upon his head.
Wheeler, the main protagonist, the first attorney to revel the inventions and be disclosed the processes, is found recklessly endangering lives, now drunk and a true danger to himself and society. In addition, the Petition filed by Iviewit contained allegations and evidence that linked the President of the Florida Bar and others to conflicts.
The Florida Supreme Court ordered a response to the Petition by the Florida Bar and what was set forth in response was perhaps the most incompetent legal response (Illiterate Florida Bar Response to Petition) ever by the Florida Bar, authored by Eric Turner - Chief Branch Officer, and Turner completed law school.
Authored with a complaint filed against him, which should have precluded his response in conflict, yet Turner so stressed out writes a letter that is legally and intelligibly incoherent, even addressing the Florida Supreme Court improperly and this is a Chief Counsel of The Florida Bar. For this letter alone Turner should have been sent back to law school.
Turners response fails to address any of the allegations in the Petition as demanded by the SCF order and instead states that the Florida Bar review work was done well.
The problem, the review was done and included responses tendered by Triggs as attorney for his partner Wheeler, while Triggs was in a confirmed black-out period at the Florida Bar where he was unable to represent any party due to his public office position with the Florida Bar.
Iviewit filed with the SCF a rebuttal identifying the Florida Bar failure to address the questions in the Petition and asking for a default judgment and also due to Turner's response failing to properly identify parties including the SCF, Rebuttal Response. Further, the exhibits in the illiterate response done by Turner which contain the Florida Bar reviewers (no investigation was undertaken) assessment of the Wheeler complaint, are all invalid, as Wheeler's responses where all tendered by Triggs in conflict but what is interesting to note is how each reviewer attempts to claim that they found no wrong doing or that Proskauer was not patent counsel.
Without any investigation, the Florida Bar is not allowed by their own rules to make any opinions in favor of either party and may only decline to undertake investigation.
Yet, the conflicts, unknown and concealed by Wheeler and Triggs had worked there magic and influenced the Florida Bar to attempt to write exculpatory language on behalf of Proskauer, one wonders what the cost of buying off justice cost.
The Florida Bar acting more as a defacto attorney protection agency versus a consumer organization, where even after being caught in conflicts and violations of public office - attorneys remain not prosecuted and where citizen complaints to The Florida Bar have been denied being filed quite inapposite the intent of the Florida Constitution in creating a bar and inapposite of the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar.

When citizens are denied the right to complain about elected officials violating clearly established laws inapposite the rules of procedure, it is reminiscent of the former Soviet Union. Shocking but true, just look up the case and watch it as it now is up for appeal at the United States Supreme Court and there is more corruption following, this time a similar series of conflicts of interest, improprieties and abuses of public office in New York, where court ordered investigations have been derailed and other miscellaneous fodder.

So we begin our dialogue regarding New York by showing that former President of the New York State Bar, Proskauer partner Steven C. Krane, was caught in conflict of interest in violation of his public office positions and where a court of five Justices ordered an immediate investigation (New York Supreme Court Appellate Division: First Department Court Order Investigate Krane) of Krane and had to have the matters moved to a new jurisdiction for investigation.

So how did Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao avoid court ordered investigation, stay tuned as more information regarding how to derail and deny due process continues, where the answer will assimilated and uploaded shortly.

OK - now if you have all week and are a speed reader, here are some of the Iviewit rebuttals to the responses these guys attempted at the state bars and they are chalk full of evidence and exhibits of all kinds of cool crimes and you will scratch your head again and again as you wonder how they got out of this, until it dawns on you that Proskauer partners in conflict handled the complaint processes against themselves and positioned and politicked like their lives depended on it to stop due process through conflict and abuse of public offices.

Proskauer's responses to the bar will start the flow here and where Proskauer's eternal defense for these crimes is stated in their sworn perjured statements to the bar and it is composed of the following arguments:

Proskauer had nothing to do with Iviewit's intellectual properties; absurd but they try it in the face of mounds of evidence and witness against such claim, including their own bills.

Iviewit is a failed dot com looking for someone to blame. So what are we still doing here and why are patents involved in a failed dot com, why are Proskauer partners being ordered for investigation for conflicts, why is Iviewit petitioning the Supreme Court with patents in suspension by the Commissioner of Patents and why is the Inspector General of the SBA preparing to audit their investment, as the largest shareholder of the company?

If these weak arguments do not hold up once a formal and conflict free investigation prevails, its goodbye Proskauer, et. al. to the federal big house, not to be confused with white collar camp, as these are some pretty heavy charges of federal, state and international crimes and again the theft is certainly grand and perhaps the largest ever attempted in history.

As we all know the patents are priceless and being used around the world in almost every home and business that's "connected" and in every form of digital imaging and video.

So with that ado here are the Proskauer responses to the original complaints and the Iviewit rebuttals.

A word of caution, Wheeler's complaint was filed before Joao and Rubenstein by a stretch and his complaint is contained in exhibit in both the Wheeler and Joao complaints. Rubenstein and Joao both likewise have the entirety of each others complaints inside their individual complaints and the Wheeler Complaint as well. This is why the documents appear so voluminous, although they are all about 1000 pages.

We threw William J. Dick of Foley and Lardner's bar complaint in as well, and this is full of evidences of the patent frauds that were discovered post Wheeler, Kenneth Rubenstein and Joao filings.

It is interesting to see how Iviewit did not know how the scam worked when filing the original complaints and did not know of the fraudulent set of identically named companies or the fraudulent set of patents and when you read more current filings you see how additional evidence continued to surface and put the puzzle together.

Even today, with much evidence still being reviewed it is as if each day new crimes are uncovered and a bit more of the truth is revealed.

Also be weary that the responses done on both Christopher Wheeler and Kenneth Rubenstein were done by Proskauer Rose partners with conflicting public office roles at those departments and the conflicts extend throughout the disciplinary departments to the executive offices of the bars and disciplinary.

Must say Proskauer Rose did do an amicable job of planting and corrupting the process through conflict but how else could they stave off of the evidence presented in the bar rebuttals and civil courts, etc.

Yet, now all prior reviews of the matters are worthless, all letters and correspondences from these departments are worthless and until the Proskauer controls on the New York disciplinary departments and New York courts are removed and then the same done in Florida, Iviewit does not have a snowballs chance in Florida of fair and impartial, conflict free due process in the courts or the attorney disciplinary agencies.

Yet, now that they are caught in the violations of public office positions it is only a matter of time until they will be prosecuted.

Source of POST and Lots of Documentation
http://www.iviewit.tv/about/index.htm
Patent Fraud

Read more...

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP