Raymond Anthony Joao – Misrepresented Proskauer Partner and Convicted Felon Marc Dreier Partner

2004 08 11 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Orders the complaints against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer, Raymond Joao, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Steven C. Krane to be moved for immediate investigation due to the appearance of impropriety and conflicts. The case was then transferred to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department where further conflicts with Krane were discovered that derailed the investigation and caused a flurry of further complaints against the Second Department members.

2004 09 07 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill’s cover letter transferring the complaints of Steven C. Krane, Proskauer, Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel due to the unanimous decision by five justices of the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department. Very interesting that Cahill handles this as he is part of an ongoing investigation for his part in the crimes at the court and thus acts in conflict and violation of his public office. What is damning is that Cahill tries to impart to the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division Second Department that they are do as they please with the cases, which is not what the justices ordered, they ordered IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION, yet Cahill tries to help himself and his buddies out of the mess again.

2004 07 12 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s, Chief Counsel, Thomas Cahill’s Motion to move the complaints of Steven C. Krane and Proskauer, note this comes after Cahill has a filed complaint against him, making this further reason for another complaint against him.

2004 07 28 Cahill to move Krane.

2004 07 08 Iviewit Motion to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department regarding the conflicts and violations of public offices of Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose, Steven C. Krane, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Raymond A. Joao and requesting immediate investigation and to move the complaints.

2003 05 26 Iviewit Rebuttal to Raymond Joao attorney misconduct complaint. 1753 Pages BOOKMARKED

2003 04 16 Supreme Court of New York First Department Disciplinary Committee regarding reply to Raymond Joao complaint.

2003 09 02 Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee response regarding Raymond Joao, Proskauer Rose, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel and Kenneth Rubenstein bar complaints which comes way late as it was lost in the mail. The document is probably fraudulent and tries to dismiss the complaints as a civil matter, although they ignore the state, federal and international crimes against the government and foreign nations exposed in the complaints.

2003 04 08 Raymond Joao’s response to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Joao actually tries to accuse Iviewit of stealing his inventions. Coocoo.

2003 02 25 Raymond Joao 9th district original attorney misconduct complaint - somehow gets transferred to the wrong district, the Supreme Court of New York Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee for prosecution with the Proskauer attorney misconduct complaints, although Joao is registered elsewhere.

Raymond Anthony Joao

my Blog about Raymond A. Joao - to do with the Trillion Dollar Stolen Patent - Iviewit - www.DeniedPatent.com

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies Alerts Mary Schapiro SEC of Major Shareholder Fraud


Click Here for SEC Complaint

to Mary Schapiro and the SEC
Regarding Intel, Warner Bros,
Jeffrey Bewkes, Lockheed Martin,
Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose,
Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher C. Wheeler,
the USPTO, Sony, SGI, Bankruptcy Courts,
Time Warner, Intel Corp, Time Inc.,
Wayne Smith of Warner, Douglas Chey,
John Calkins, P. Stephen Lamont,
the New York Attorney General,
NY Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court,
the US Patent Office, IBM,
CEO Paul Otellini of Intel Corp., the Florida Attorney Bar,
the New York Attorney Bar, Michael Grebe,
the Bradley Foundation and a whole lot More.



Friday, September 24, 2010

Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California v. Cathay Bank et. al.Complaint for Patent Infringement

"Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California

Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California, LLC
v. Cathay Bank et. al.Complaint for Patent Infringement


6,047,270: “Apparatus and method for providing account security” by Joao et. al. Prosecuted by Joao; Raymond A.. Includes 86 claims (12 indep.). Was application 08/918,284. Filed 8/25/1997 & Granted 4/4/2000.

Who ProtectsRaymond Joao's Patent Infringement Crimes ?

What Judges, Patent Attorneys, Wall of Corruption Protects the Patent Crimes of Raymond Joao www.RaymondJoao.com

Raymond Joao is GUILTY !! that is a Given, the only question is How Long will he be protected to commit more Patent Crimes jsut because of what he knows and who he knows it on .. with the Iviewit Technologies Patent Denial and Iviewit Intellectual Property Theft (www.DeniedPatent.com )

Got a Tip on Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California v. Cathay Bank et. al.Complaint for Patent Infringement ? Email your Tip To Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Joao Bock Transaction Systems of California v. Cathay Bank et. al.

Posted by Crystal L. Cox at 8:56 AM
Labels: , , ,

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

About This Blog

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP