MPEG - Proskauer Stealing Inventions - by Eliot I. Bernstein. Proskauer Rose Patent Fraud.
"My name is Eliot Bernstein and I am one of the inventors of the Iviewit inventions. Many of the quotes here are from me and the proof for many of these claims can be found at the iviewit.tv website. Simply go to left navigation bar and click on the Supreme Court button and then click on either Appendix C or Exhibit Gallery.
Although voluminous in size, the exhibits are chalk full of evidence and information regarding the ongoing investigations. Also, much can be learned at the Iviewit blog at http://patentgate.blogspot.com .
In response to this post, Rubenstein and Proskauer took invention disclosures from Iviewit inventors and patented those concepts into their management referral, Brian Utley's name. Rubenstein also contracted Raymond Joao at the law firm Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel to file the applications, while Rubenstein and Proskauer handled all of the other intellectual property work, including Rubenstein acting as a board member and opining to many investors on the inventions.
Raymond Joao worked at the law firm that Kenneth Rubenstein was at immediately prior to his learning of the Iviewit inventions, MLGWS and then after learning of the inventions, Rubenstein instantly jumped to Proskauer, a firm that had no other intellectual property department to speak of and had been a real estate firm since the 1800's. Proskauer had already been retained and began work for Iviewit prior to Kenneth Rubenstein leaving Meltzer and in fact, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao were initially represented as Proskauer Rose attorneys, although they were still at Meltzer.
Joao filed patents into his own name while retained by Iviewit to file patents as Kenneth Rubenstein's lackey.
Raymond A. Joao's patents contained many of the ideas he and Kenneth Rubenstein learned from the Iviewit inventors, the disclosures and business plans of Iviewit.
It is absurd to think that a patent attorney could file any patents in his name without a thorough conflict waiver from all clients and approval from the patent bar. History has never had a case where the patent attorney ran out and filed a blizzard of patents all crossing into his clients patent applications.
Raymond Joao was also part of an elaborate scheme to move the patents out of Iviewit and into companies that Proskauer Rose Set up that had similar and identical names to the Iviewit companies.
Yet, the shareholder of those companies appears to be Proskauer and others, not the true Iviewit shareholders or inventors.
Iviewit shareholders, including the SBA were totally unaware that these similar companies had been set up and unaware that that similar patents were being filed into these companies with the false inventor Utley, false owners and assignees.
Raymond Joao was discovered patenting ideas into his name and other dubious behavior and he was fired for his actions.
Proskauer Rose and Brian Utley referred William Dick of Foley and Lardner to replace Raymond Joao, Brian Utley stated that William Dick was the IBM Far East patent attorney and his very close personal friend.
The original Proskauer attorney, Christopher Clarke Wheeler, Esq. (recently arrested in Del Ray Beach, FL for DUI with bodily injury) failed to disclose that he, Utley and Dick were involved in intellectual property crimes from Utley's former employ, Diamond Turf Equipment owned by Monte Freidkin of Boca Raton.
Alan Friedkin discovered that patents were walking out the door to Brian Utley's sole name and fired him. It was not learned until Christopher C. Wheeler and Brian tley's deposition and William ick's response to the Virginia Bar that the three of them had been involved in the crime.
Christopher Wheeler set up the company, William Dick wrote the patents from Brian Utley's employer secretly into Utley's name at home and Brian Utley got in and stole the inventions from his employer. This is the same type of scam that they instituted on Iviewit and again appear to be failing achieving their ends.
William Dick was Raymond Joao's replacement and since it was never disclosed by any of them the fact of their prior past patent theft attempt, Iviewit was dumbfounded to find this prior history out after learning they were stealing Iviewit inventions.
Moreover, Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer Rose submitted a resume on Brian Utley that claimed that Diamond Turf went on to be a huge success do to Utley's inventions, when the truth was that the company was instantly closed by Friedkin after he found Utley stealing from his company while acting as the President of Friedkins company.
Brian Utley failed to disclose this, Christopher Wheeler and Proskauer Rose never disclosed this when Iviewit retained them and Dick and Foley failed to inform us of Dick's past with this group. This is a criminal organization of patent thieves, they have a history and they are a danger to inventors, good lawyers everywhere and the United States and foreign countries patent systems.
I am not against patent attorneys filing patents as long as there is a hefty review by the patent department or the USTPO OED, to investigate if those attorney inventions lay claim on any client inventions they may have represented or as in our case misrepresented. It is very dangerous for patent attorneys to be patenting inventions for themselves while representing client interests, and the obvious collusion amongst patent attorneys to work together to steal each others clients inventions remains a gaping hole.
Yet these guys filed false oaths on applications in others names for inventions they learned while retained by the Iviewit inventors, no excuse can be had for this, this is plain theft, fraud on the patent office, fraud on the Iviewit inventors, the Iviewit shareholders and all the EPO foreign offices and the history of the world and invention. This is not even close to a patent attorney having a novel idea (although that seems far fetched as attorneys are not typically inventive) and then patenting it in his name with no client involved.
Raymond Joao has stated that some of his inventions were prior to ours and that Iviewit was in fact infringing on his inventions (he claimed this to the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee), yet Joao failed to seek waivers or disclose this in writing or verbally to anyone seems absurd.
I find it further disgusting that MPEG patent inclusion is controlled by a single person, Rubenstein, where the temptation is all to obvious. Patent pooling schemes have been killed historically by the Justice Department for the very reasons that Iviewit complains of, anti-competitive monopolistic practices that violate Sherman and Clayton and almost every antitrust practice.
Patent pooling schemes created by lawyers to make money as middlemen also seems to violate ethics.
For instance, how can Proskauer Rose and Kenneth Rubenstein profit from MPEG as counsel for MPEG, as Kenneth Rubenstein discloses in his deposition at the Iviewit Exhibit gallery and at the same time taking invention disclosure as counsel under Proskauer Rose for review from the inventors for patent concepts that could completely render MPEG useless, as the Iviewit inventions do?
How can Kenneth Rubenstein review Iviewit patents for MPEG and at the same time give Iviewit unbiased advice on their patents or control their fate by inclusion or exclusion.
The conflict is as wide as the Grand Canyon, no China Wall, in fact an open door for crime to occur, crimes that violate Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 inventor protections by those entrusted to protect those rights as part of the patent bar.
The obvious is happening here, MPEG and Proskauer ROSE have found a way to review patents as patent counsel and then steal them as patent poolers looking to profit from others inventions.
The first complaint that was filed at the patent office was in an invention format as a joke, not a joke to laugh at, it was appropriately titled, "System and Method for Committing Fraud on the United States Patent Office and the Iviewit Inventors".
Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Technologies, Inc.
iviewit@iviewit.tv
Source
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20060119/1225216.shtml
p
p
0 comments:
Post a Comment